TheSequence

TheSequence

Share this post

TheSequence
TheSequence
The Sequence Opinion #485: What's Wrong With AI Benchmarks

The Sequence Opinion #485: What's Wrong With AI Benchmarks

Contamination, limited evals and some of the challenges and potential solutions of the benchmarking space.

Feb 06, 2025
∙ Paid
11

Share this post

TheSequence
TheSequence
The Sequence Opinion #485: What's Wrong With AI Benchmarks
1
Share
Created Using Midjourney

In the generative AI era, evaluations and benchmarking have rapidly evolved from a set of quantitative metrics into the primary means by which we understand the capabilities of foundation models. With explainability techniques such as mechanistic interpretability still in their infancy, benchmarks serve as a crucial tool for deriving insights into the inner workings of generative AI models. Every day, new benchmarks emerge to evaluate unique model capabilities. Yet, the evaluation and benchmarking space faces a major crisis. This essay explores the current challenges in AI benchmarking and the trends shaping its future.

The Challenges of Modern AI Benchmarking

AI benchmarking today is undermined by three significant challenges: data contamination, memorization dynamics, and benchmark saturation. These issues necessitate a fundamental shift in how we assess AI systems.

The Contamination Conundrum

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jesus Rodriguez
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share