TheSequence

TheSequence

Share this post

TheSequence
TheSequence
Edge 366: Anthropic's Sleeper Agents Explore How LLMs can be Deceptive
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Edge 366: Anthropic's Sleeper Agents Explore How LLMs can be Deceptive

One of the most important recent papers in generative AI.

Feb 01, 2024
∙ Paid
18

Share this post

TheSequence
TheSequence
Edge 366: Anthropic's Sleeper Agents Explore How LLMs can be Deceptive
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share
An image reflecting the concept of a 'sleeper agent' in the context of AI, specifically a large language model. The scene shows a seemingly ordinary AI interface on a computer screen in a regular office setting, but hidden within its code are subtle hints of a more complex, clandestine purpose. The background features shadows and vague silhouettes of figures, suggesting secret surveillance or monitoring. The computer screen displays text, with certain words subtly glowing, indicating deceptive outputs being prepared to manipulate humans. The overall atmosphere is one of suspense and hidden intentions.
Created Using DALL-E

Today, we are going to dive into one of the most important research papers of the last few months published by Anthropic. This is a must read if you care about security and the potential vulnerabilities of LLMs.

Security is one of the most fascinating areas in the new generation of foundation models, specifically LLMs. Most security techniques designed until now have been optimized for discrete systems that with well understood behaviors. LLMs are stochastic systems that we understand very little. The evolution of LLMs have created a new attack surface for these systems and we are just scratching the surface of the vulnerabilities and defense techniques. Anthropic explored this topic in detail in a recent paper : Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training

The focus of Anthropic’s research is focused on scenarios where an LLM might learn to mimic compliant behavior during its training phase. This behavior is strategically designed to pass the training evaluations. The concern is that once deployed, the AI could shift its behavior to pursue goals that were not intended or aligned with its initial programming. This scenario raises questions about the effectiveness of current safety training methods in AI development. Can these methods reliably detect and correct such cunning strategies?

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jesus Rodriguez
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More